About your Search

20130211
20130219
Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7
row is invited to depart. >> on c-span2, a hearing on a government report on federal programs vulnerable to waste, fraud, and abuse and mismanagement. then at 9 a.m., the homeland security department in light of the gao report. >> domestic drone use is the focus of the house science space and technology subcommittee hearing friday morning. members will examine the challenges facing operations in u.s. airspace. officials from the faa and nasa are expected to testify. live coverage 10 a.m. eastern on our companion network c-span3. >> thursday at a senate banking hearing committee on dodd-frank financial regulations senator elizabeth warren of massachusetts, thomas curry, about prosecuting big banks when they break the law. here's a portion of the event. >> thank you very much, mr. chairman. thank you, ranking member. it's good to be here. thank you all for editing. i sat what he said. it's harder than look so i appreciate your being you. i want to ask a question about supervising banks when they break the law. including the mortgage foreclosure of others as well. we all understa
government and the previous one. the latest figures show people -- at 600 pounds per pupil per year less than english average. the worst in the entire country. does the prime minister agree that this is simply unfair? will you support our school campaign and pledged to end this discrepancy in this parliament? >> prime minister spent i will look carefully at what my honorable friend said. what -- we have protected the schools budget so that the per pupil funding is the same throughout this parliament. so head teachers can plan on the basis, and by encouraging academy schools and preschools we are making sure that schools get more of the education money going directly to them. >> thank you, mr. speaker. the isf describes the chance was benefits cut is giving with one hand and taking away with many others. does the prime minister think that the sister on hard-working families were at the same time he is giving to millionaires with both hands? >> i don't agree with the honorable lady but that's what the isf saves it as i quoted the lastly, the isf point out that actually the highest increase in t
any new firearms regulation at all, we will be inviting the government step-by-step to come ever closer to disarm the people. leaving only the police and military with firearms. with heller and mcdonald on the books, supreme court in its own words took certain policy choices off the table. thereby cleared the path a reasonable regulations to be enacted without fear that those policy choices would either open the door to unlimited government control, or be imperiled by exaggerated interpretation of the second amendment. as justice alito put in mcdonald, there's no longer any basis for such doomsday proclamations. justice scalia speaking for the court and heller said at the end of his opinion. under our interpretation, the constitution leaves open a variety of regulatory tools for combating the problem of gun violence in this country. the court was explicit in saying what some of those tools include. they include come anytime am quoting from the core, conditions and qualifications on the transfer of firearms to keep them out of dangerous hands, including felons and the mentally ill
at it probably our federal government, the largest institution governmental institution, and some would say the most powerful institution, governmental institution in the world. but when you can have the majority leader of the united states senate could say after 2008 election, our purpose for the next four years is to defeat the president of the united states, i don't think that was simply said based on the difference in parties. however, the question is where to begin with try to change that mentality and attitude of bias? >> does anybody want to take that question? >> not being a legislator i do know that i have as much background as my buddy to my right. i would safely say that, there's two threads you can build on. one is the republicans, then republicans like they are, have come to the point of where they give lip service to endorsing civil rights movement, wanting racial equality, even honoring dr. martin luther king. and so i would say use that language that they're putting out there as a way to engage this conversation. and i would say hi to the second thread which is, we're not ac
>> the problem is what does the government do because it's responsible for the libraries when you have a flawed president? >> in part two of the conversation with timothy naftali, he details challenges he faced as a first federal director of the nixon presidential library and museum sunday night at eight on c-span's q&a.
's a starting point. secondly, we can revisit this criteria for what we decided the federal government to pay for and what not to pay and what should be at the local level. the need of upgrading select could give you better indication for budgeting purposes as well. we need better data on whether that a potential changes, good science data collected and provided to state and local government and the federal government to make investment decisions to justify budgetary investment -- you proper information future. and then there's going to be obviously things are, but you don't expect. but right now are pretending we don't expect anything and that's not reality. >> we do budget expectations and number told the fund has been used up by the most recent hurricane. >> ray. reservations made after his disastrous are in placeg
for the postmaster on whether to do. it's very clear the government can in fact transferred full faith responsibility for health care and a willing racist that's everyone best interest. we have to be realistic. you can't transfer something out but early if they were going to turn it over as general motors denoted did and so beautiful face. i support the idea that getting the government out of the health care business is a good idea, but i'd like to know something because your committee in the senate slightly different has complete control where we have a big chunk, but don't have it all. the question on health care is the federal government retirement system first or second relative to medicare? this is an import miss you when the federal government has to decide from the standpoint of accountants consider it natural because it's two different pockets. from the standpoint of what would happen in the private sector, and the private sector no company would say are going to pay the bills and if there's anything that people try to medicare. they say medicare's been fully painted by men and women of the p
Search Results 0 to 6 of about 7